Search
Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

Valsartan Lawsuit MDL: Latest Updates on Cancer-Related Claims

Lawsuits over the alleged link between valsartan and cancer have raised serious concerns about the safety of this widely prescribed blood pressure medication. Reports of contamination with N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), a potential carcinogen, have led to widespread recalls and a surge in legal claims. Patients who relied on valsartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), now face the possibility of increased cancer risk, including pancreatic, colorectal, stomach, liver, and kidney cancers.

As the litigation unfolds, more than 1,200 valsartan, losartan, and irbesartan lawsuits have been consolidated into multidistrict litigation (MDL) in New Jersey. This legal action involves plaintiffs seeking justice for cancer diagnoses potentially linked to contaminated valsartan or similar blood pressure medications. The valsartan litigation has brought to light critical issues surrounding drug safety, manufacturing processes, and the responsibilities of pharmaceutical companies. 

Overview of the Valsartan Lawsuit MDL

The valsartan lawsuit arises from an investigation by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration into impurities found in generic valsartan medications. These impurities, identified as N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA) and N-nitrosodiethylamine (NDEA), are potential carcinogens that have raised serious health concerns. Plaintiffs allege that they purchased or used generic valsartan tainted with these nitrosamine impurities, which they claim present a risk of cancer and other serious injuries. The lawsuits further assert that defendants knew or should have known about these impurities as early as 2012 but failed to warn the public.

Alleged Injuries Leading to a Valsartan Lawsuit

The valsartan lawsuits claim that exposure to contaminated medication has led to various types of cancer, including:

  • Bladder cancer
  • Stomach cancer
  • Liver cancer
  • Colorectal cancer
  • Kidney cancer
  • Pancreatic cancer

Additionally, plaintiffs allege liver injuries requiring hospitalization. It’s important to note that the scientific community has not definitively established a single, individual cause of cancer from nitrosamine exposure.

Recent Developments in the Valsartan Litigation

Defendants Involved in the Valsartan Lawsuit

The valsartan litigation involves numerous defendants across the pharmaceutical supply chain. These include:

  • API Manufacturers: Zhejiang Huahai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hetero Labs, Ltd., and others 
  • Finished Dose Manufacturers: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., and more 
  • Distributors: Solco Healthcare U.S., LLC, Camber Pharmaceuticals, Inc., among others 
  • Wholesalers: AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc., and McKesson Corporation 

The litigation also involves repackagers and pharmacies that sold contaminated valsartan. This wide range of defendants reflects the complexity of the pharmaceutical supply chain and the widespread nature of the alleged contamination.

Latest Court Rulings in Valsartan Lawsuits

Judge Kugler recently rejected a motion by valsartan drug makers and distributors to exclude expert testimony linking the contaminated drug to cancer. This ruling allowed valsartan trials to proceed with scientific study findings usable as evidence against the implicated parties. Additionally, Judge Kugler certified consumer and insurance companies’ claims against manufacturers and distributors of tainted valsartan.

Judge Bumb, who recently took over the litigation following Judge Kugler’s retirement, has pushed the litigation forward. She issued an order for plaintiffs and defendants to finalize the settlement terms for all three classes of valsartan plaintiffs: personal injury, economic loss, and medical monitoring. This could indicate a global settlement potentially on the horizon for personal injury plaintiffs.

Impact on Valsartan Patients and Future Outlook

The long-term effects of NDMA exposure through contaminated valsartan are a significant concern. NDMA has been linked to various types of cancer, including bladder, stomach, liver, colorectal, kidney, and pancreatic cancers. Animal studies have shown that ingesting high to moderate levels of NDMA caused major liver damage after just a few days and cancer after several weeks. The continuous long-term use of contaminated valsartan is particularly troubling, as some patients may have been ingesting NDMA once or twice daily for several years. The consolidation of over 1,200 lawsuits into multidistrict litigation has paved the way for a comprehensive examination of the alleged valsartan contamination and its potential health impacts.

Valsartan Lawsuit Information

Valsartan lawsuits are alleging a link between the recalled blood pressure medication and various types of cancer due to NDMA contamination. Learn more by clicking on the button.
FREE
author avatar
Faith Anderson
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp

Related Posts

Valsartan Bellwether Lawsuit Over Cancer Claims Scheduled for 2025

The manufacturers of generic valsartan medications have been under intense scrutiny since it was discovered that certain formulations of the drug contained harmful, cancer-causing impurities. This article delves into the ongoing valsartan litigation, focusing on the upcoming bellwether trial set for September 2025, which could have significant implications for individuals

Study: Pesticide Exposure Linked to Cancer Rates on Par with Smoking

Farming communities across the United States face a startling health crisis – the widespread use of pesticides in agricultural practices has been found to contribute to cancer rates that rival the devastating impact of smoking. A new study has uncovered the alarming extent to which pesticide exposure poses a threat

Johnson’s Talcum Powder Mesothelioma Lawsuit Ends in $63M Verdict

A jury has awarded $63.4 million in a lawsuit brought by a South Carolina man who developed mesothelioma after using Johnson & Johnson’s talcum powder products. This verdict marks a significant development in the ongoing talcum powder litigation, highlighting the potential health risks associated with long-term talc exposure. The trial

Scroll to Top