Search
Search
Close this search box.
Search
Close this search box.

J&J Adds $1.1 Billion to Proposed Talcum Powder Cancer Settlement

Johnson & Johnson has been hit with a wave of talcum powder lawsuits in recent years, with tens of thousands of individuals alleging that their use of the company’s talc-based products led to the development of ovarian cancer and other life-threatening conditions. Now, J&J has agreed to add an additional $1.1 billion to the ovarian cancer settlement that it initially proposed in May, bringing the total value of the agreement to more than $9 billion.

This decision marks a crucial step forward in the company’s efforts to resolve the ongoing litigation surrounding its controversial talcum powder products. The increased settlement offer, which will be paid out over the course of 25 years, is expected to garner the support of a majority of the claimants, paving the way for a potential resolution to this long-standing litigation.

The Evolving Talcum Powder Cancer Litigation

The talcum powder issue has been a subject of ongoing litigation and debate for years, with numerous individuals and their families alleging that the use of J&J’s baby powder and other talc-based products led to the development of ovarian cancer and other serious health issues, including mesothelioma. J&J maintains that its talc products are safe and do not cause cancer.

Over the past several years, courts have seen a significant number of lawsuits filed against J&J, with some high-profile verdicts awarded to plaintiffs. In 2018, a Missouri court ordered the company to pay $2.1 billion to 22 women who claimed their ovarian cancer was caused by the use of J&J’s talcum powder products. This verdict, along with other similar rulings, have contributed to the growing pressure on the healthcare giant to find a resolution to the ongoing litigation.

J&J’s Controversial Bankruptcy Plan

In response to the mounting legal challenges, J&J has been exploring various strategies to address the talcum powder cancer lawsuits. One of the company’s most recent efforts involves a controversial maneuver known as the “Texas two-step” bankruptcy plan.

Under this approach, J&J has created a subsidiary, LTL Management LLC, and has transferred its talc-related liabilities to that subsidiary. If the bankruptcy plan moves forward, LTL Management LLC would then file for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, allowing the company to consolidate all the talcum powder claims into a single settlement process. This strategy has been met with significant opposition from some plaintiffs’ lawyers, who have argued that it is an attempt to avoid full accountability.

The $9 Billion Talcum Powder Settlement Offer

Despite the ongoing legal battles, J&J has now taken a significant step forward in its efforts to resolve the talcum powder litigation. The company has agreed to add an additional $1.1 billion to its proposed settlement, bringing the total value of the talcum powder cancer agreement to more than $9 billion. J&J announced last week that it had reached an agreement with a plaintiffs’ lawyer representing 12,000 claimants to recommend the offer to his clients.

Will the Settlement Be Approved?

For the proposed settlement to be approved by the courts, J&J needs to secure the support of at least 75% of the claimants. With the additional $1.1 billion in funding and the backing of this key plaintiffs’ lawyer, the company is confident that it will exceed this threshold and “facilitate an expeditious confirmation” of the plan.

The increased settlement offer is a significant concession from J&J, which has long maintained that its talcum powder products are safe and do not cause cancer. However, the company’s decision to add more funds to the settlement suggests that it may be seeking to avoid the uncertainty and potential financial consequences of protracted legal battles.

Talcum Powder Settlement Will Address Ovarian Cancer Claims

The latest talcum powder settlement offer from J&J is primarily focused on addressing the claims related to ovarian cancer, which have been the bulk of the legal actions against the company. The settlement will cover allegations that the use of talcum powder products led to the development of ovarian and other gynecological cancers.

It is important to note that the settlement does not include claims from plaintiffs alleging that their exposure to asbestos-laced talc caused mesothelioma, a rare and aggressive form of cancer. J&J has maintained that its talc products do not contain asbestos, but this issue continues to be a point of contention in the ongoing litigation.

Talcum Powder Lawsuit Information

Talcum powder lawsuits are alleging a link between the widely used baby powder and an increased risk of ovarian cancer and mesothelioma. Learn more by clicking on the button.
FREE
author avatar
Faith Anderson
Facebook
Twitter
Pinterest
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp

Related Posts

Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Will Remain Paused, Judge Rules

The ongoing legal battles surrounding talcum powder, particularly those linked to Johnson & Johnson’s baby powder, have drawn significant public attention and concern. As numerous lawsuits allege that the company’s talc-based products may contribute to serious health issues, including cancer, the situation remains complex and evolving. Recently, a bankruptcy judge

Justice Department Slams J&J Talc Lawsuit Bankruptcy Move as ‘Bad Faith’

The U.S. Department of Justice has taken a decisive stance against Johnson & Johnson’s controversial talc lawsuit bankruptcy strategy, declaring it an act of bad faith. This significant development in the J&J talc lawsuit challenges the company’s attempt to resolve thousands of cancer claims through a subsidiary’s bankruptcy filing, commonly

Jury Awards $15 Million to MA Man in Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuit

A jury in Connecticut has awarded $15 million to a Massachusetts man who allegedly developed mesothelioma after decades of exposure to talcum powder products. The verdict represents another significant development in the ongoing talcum powder cancer litigation against Johnson & Johnson. The plaintiff claimed that his regular use of talc-based

Scroll to Top